www.ufo-tv.com.

Posts Tagged ‘standard’

US Army denies clemency for WikiLeaks source Manning – Business Standard

Written by Seraphin. Posted in WikiLeaks in the news

US Army denies clemency for WikiLeaks source Manning
Business Standard
A US Army general has denied clemency to the soldier formerly known as Bradley Manning for leaking hundreds of thousands of documents to anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks, upholding a 35-year sentence. Major General Jeffrey Buchanan, the convening …

and more »

wikileaks – Google News

Be Sociable, Share!

Assange doesn’t think Obama ‘wears the pants’ when it comes to controlling … – Business Standard

Written by Seraphin. Posted in WikiLeaks in the news

Assange doesn't think Obama 'wears the pants' when it comes to controlling
Business Standard
Wikileaks founder Julian Assange questioned US President Barack Obama's control over the nation's intelligence operation in light of the mega leaks by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden. Assange asked if Obama is wearing pants, and related to the 

and more »

wikileaks – Google News

Related External Links

Be Sociable, Share!

WikiLeaks, fiction and libel at ICA – Evening Standard

Written by Seraphin. Posted in WikiLeaks in the news


Evening Standard
WikiLeaks, fiction and libel at ICA
Evening Standard
Over to the ICA and the launch of Jim Naughtie's thriller, The Madness of July, where I ran into recently retired Guardian journalist David Leigh, who worked on the WikiLeaks cables. What did he think of the extended London Review of Books piece in which 

wikileaks – Google News

Related External Links

Be Sociable, Share!

Sarah Sands: Julian Assange is just a fading star of cyberspace – Evening Standard

Written by Seraphin. Posted in WikiLeaks in the news


Evening Standard
Sarah Sands: Julian Assange is just a fading star of cyberspace
Evening Standard
The WikiLeaks warrior Julian Assange is a rock star on the skids. Without new releases or a world tour his fame is fading. At a dinner party recently an Assange loyalist offered the media/arts guests the chance of meeting him at the Ecuadorian Embassy.

and more »

wikileaks – Google News

Related External Links

Be Sociable, Share!

Assange takes a dig at Obama’s surveillance proposal – Business Standard

Written by Seraphin. Posted in WikiLeaks in the news

Assange takes a dig at Obama's surveillance proposal
Business Standard
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange today criticised US President Barack Obama's proposal to limit the controversial surveillance programme, saying his plan is not concrete and will not change much. In a bid to allay global outrage after the leak of the US 

and more »

wikileaks – Google News

Related External Links

Be Sociable, Share!

The Project Mogul Double Standard

Written by Seraphin. Posted in UFO's in the news

Here’s an interesting question that is generated by the recent discussions of Delbert Newhouse and his UFO footage. There are those on the skeptical side of the fence who reject his close up description of objects that were gunmetal-colored disks because that description doesn’t appear in the written record until nearly two years after the fact. One debunker seemed to be outraged that I had mentioned that this was what Newhouse told me because I didn’t talk to him until 1976. Of course, I was merely pointing out that I had talked to him and that this description of the UFOs had come from him rather than a survey of the literature, which, of course, makes that first-hand testimony regardless of when gathered.

The theory among the debunkers is that Newhouse embellished his sighing to make it more interesting for some obscure personal reasons. Maybe he didn’t want to be identified as a Navy officer who couldn’t identify sea gulls when he saw them. Maybe he was embarrassed by the identification made by those who apparently never bothered to interview him and only believed what they read in the Project Blue Book files. Maybe Newhouse wanted to increase the importance of his sighting.

Yes, we all understand that memories are often flawed and that they can be unconsciously embellished over time in a process that is known as confabulation. That means simply that the mind has filled in details that might not have been observed. The witness is not lying in the classical sense, is not aware that he or she is not relating reality, and truly believes what he or she says about the situation.

So, what does this have to do with Project Mogul and double standards?

Well, there are those on the skeptical side of the fence who believe that a Project Mogul array fell near Roswell, was partially recovered by Mack Brazel, and that is what caused all the fuss about a crashed alien spacecraft. Ironically, and ignored by those same skeptics is the theory that is refuted by the written records made at the time. Never mind that because Charles Moore, one of the engineers who worked on Project Mogul told us all that he remembered that flight, that it was the first successful balloon flight in New Mexico, and the reason for the delay in identifying it was because Project Mogul was so highly classified that he hadn’t heard the name until Robert Todd told him in 1992 (we, of course, know that the name appeared in the records made at the time in 1946 and 1947 which is one of the first indications that Moore might not be relating reality to us).

To flog this dead horse, I will repeat what we all know. According to the written record Mogul Flight No. 4 was cancelled. There is no equivocation about it. The flight was cancelled, which should be the end of the story… but no, Albert Crary’s diary, the written record and part of the source material, mentions that a cluster of balloons was flown on the date in question. This is Flight No. 4. We know this because Moore told us so fifty years after the fact and his memory, which is in conflict with the written record, is acceptable, while Newhouse’s memory is not.

Charles Moore, who knew exactly what that cluster of balloons was, told everyone that this was actually Flight No. 4. And although the Mogul flights were not scheduled before dawn in June 1947, Flight No. 4 was launched, not at dawn, but around 3:00 in the morning, according to Moore. Why? Because a weather front went through Alamogordo about dawn and the weather data from it suggest that the balloon trajectory would have not been toward the Brazel ranch. However, if it was launched about 3:00, then the winds aloft data can be used to predict a path toward Corona, New Mexico and the Brazel ranch.

The documentation from the New York University balloon project shows that the first successful flight in New Mexico was Flight No. 5. But Moore claimed that Flight No. 4 was just as successful; they just didn’t record it. If it was as successful, then why not record it and tout it as the first successful flight in New Mexico? Why not report the data collected rather than leave it out of the record altogether. Why would Crary say the flight had been cancelled if it had actually flown and was successful?

Because a cluster of balloons was just that… a cluster of balloons. We know from later entries what that means. When flights were cancelled, they sometimes conducted experiments using some of the balloons and equipment. So, Flight No. 4 was not launched in the dark, which would have violated the CAA regulations under which they operated, and was cancelled because of clouds at dawn, which was demanded by the CAA. If it was cancelled at dawn, then how could it be launched some three hours earlier at 3:00?

Let’s also remember that Moore had originally calculated the launch time as about 5:00 a.m. because that was dawn in New Mexico in July 1947, and Flight No. 5 was launched just after 5:00 the next day. That was, of course, before the winds aloof data ruled out the dawn launch. And, explain how it would make sense to say that the flight was cancelled but it was launched before the clouds became an issue… well, obviously this is true because that is what Charles Moore remembered fifty years after the fact and his memories of those long ago events are not flawed.

Oh, so we don’t get lost in arguments over source material, in his 1995 paper, Moore calculated the launch time as about 5:00 but in the Benson, Saler, Zieler, and Moore book, ironically called UFO Crash at Roswell: Genesis of a Modern Myth, on page 102, he changes the time. What we have here is clear evidence of Moore changing the times, not based on newer and better evidence, but on his memory to prove his own theory… or maybe I should say his alleged memory because there is no documentation to support the earlier launch.

The documentation available from that time also tells us that the CAA governed the launch of these Mogul balloon trains because they were some 600 or so feet long and would be a threat to aerial navigation. They couldn’t be launched when there were clouds to hide them and they couldn’t be launched at night because pilots wouldn’t be able to see them. The rules and regulations in place in 1947 are clear and the documentation is clear on those points.

True, in July, as they worked the project and the length of the arrays was reduced considerably, these factors were altered, but in June, they were in place. They couldn’t launch at night and they couldn’t launch because of clouds, so Flight No. 4 was cancelled. Until Moore said otherwise and we can believe him because it is true that he would never embellish his self-proclaimed place in history as the man who launched the Roswell wreck.

Here’s another interesting side note. There was a discussion about NOTAMs, which are Notices to Airmen about information that would be important for aviation safety. The launches of these arrays required a NOTAM to be filed, but Moore said that no NOTAM had been filed for Flight No. 4 because they expected it to remain over restricted airspace on the Alamogordo (White Sands Proving Ground) ranges until it was above normal aviation operating altitudes or something around 30,000 feet. The questions are: why would he remember that, and why should we believe him?

I could go on, but is there a point? We know, based on the records that Flight No. 4 was cancelled and that the cluster of balloons does not a Mogul array make. We know that the flight did not fly at 3:00 in the morning, but had it been launched then, it would have been noted as being launched then and there wouldn’t be the note that it had been cancelled. We know what the cluster was, based on other entries, and Moore had to know that as well but just made contradictory statements about it anyway. (In 1995, Moore acknowledged that a valid interpretation of Crary’s diary was that Flight No. 4 was cancelled.)

I say that if you reject Newhouse because his later statements about the length of his movie disagree with the documentation made within weeks of his shooting it, then Moore’s statements about Mogul Flight No. 4 can be rejected because they are in conflict with the written record. I really don’t see any difference here. In both cases we have statements made after the fact, years after the fact, which are contradicted by information gathered at the time.

I just want to see the same standards applied to both sides of the coin. But I will say this in defense of Newhouse. I don’t believe (please note the qualification here) Newhouse was consciously changing his story and there is some evidence to back that up. For example, only about 40 seconds of his movie was released, meaning that some 35 seconds are not readily available. I think he believed he was telling the truth… Moore knew what he was doing and deliberately misled us all in his attempt to be the man who launched the Roswell case. What I don’t understand is how anyone looking at the facts can believe that Moore and Mogul had anything to do with Roswell. Remember, that doesn’t prove it was alien, only that this particular explanation has failed… based on the documentation and not on the fifty year old memories of one man


UFO updates

Related External Links

Be Sociable, Share!

Julian Assange not under ‘sealed indictment’: US official – Business Standard

Written by Seraphin. Posted in WikiLeaks in the news

Julian Assange not under 'sealed indictment': US official
Business Standard
Federal officials said the grand jury investigation has not been closed, and a spokesman for WikiLeaks said the organization drew no comfort from the fact that there was no sealed indictment. Assange, who published documents from one of the largest leaks 

and more »

wikileaks – Google News

Related External Links

Be Sociable, Share!

WikiLeaks expose: Drug makers see red – Business Standard

Written by Seraphin. Posted in WikiLeaks in the news

WikiLeaks expose: Drug makers see red
Business Standard
The domestic drug manufacturing industry has raised concern at the revelations by the WikiLeaks anti-secrecy group, highlighting provisions proposed by the US government in the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) that could impact generic penetration into 

and more »

wikileaks – Google News

Related External Links

Be Sociable, Share!

Ecuador president says UK violating Assange’s human rights by holding him in … – Business Standard

Written by Seraphin. Posted in WikiLeaks in the news

Ecuador president says UK violating Assange's human rights by holding him in
Business Standard
Ecaudor's President Rafael Correa has reportedly claimed that Britain is violating the human rights of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange by not allowing him to leave London. Assange has been holed up in the Ecuadorean embassy in London for more than a 

and more »

wikileaks – Google News

Related External Links

Be Sociable, Share!