Roswell | ufo-tv.com

May 2012
M	T	W	T	F	S	S
« Apr
	1	2	3	4	5	6
7	8	9	10	11	12	13
14	15	16	17	18	19	20
21	22	23	24	25	26	27
28	29	30	31

Posts Tagged ‘roswell’

Did the Canadians Analyze the Roswell Metal?

May 29th, 2012 |

Did the Canadians Analyze the Roswell Crash Material?

Notes of a conversation with Defense Research Board Scientist A.W.L. Bridge

As a background to the conversation the reader should know that Arthur Bridge was a Canadian government scientist working for the defense research board which was the main weapon research unit for the department of defense.

Bridge was a member of a secret “inner circle” of government employees who worked with Wilbert Smith on gravity control experiments and other sensitive matters. The work was done in off hours. Bridge was the youngest member of the group.

UFO updates

Incoming search terms:

Powered by Article Dashboard hiking trails in oklahoma (1)

Be Sociable, Share!

Tweet

Posted in UFO's in the news |

Tags: Analyze, Canadians, metal, roswell |

No Comments »

The International UFO Museum And Research Center At Roswell, New Mexico – Gadling

May 11th, 2012 |

Author: Seraphin

The International UFO Museum And Research Center At Roswell, New Mexico
Gadling
The incident was soon forgotten, even by most Ufologists, until in 1978 a UFO researcher started interviewing locals who claimed to have seen the debris and said it was part of an extraterrestrial craft. Accounts of alien bodies and a massive cover up …

ufo – Google News

Incoming search terms:

Be Sociable, Share!

Tweet

Posted in UFO's in the news |

Tags: center, Gadling, international, mexico, museum, research, roswell |

No Comments »

UFO Mother Ship in RUSSIA – RUSSIAN ROSWELL – Expert Analysis & Truth – ringsidereport.com (blog)

May 8th, 2012 |

Author: Seraphin

UFO Mother Ship in RUSSIA – RUSSIAN ROSWELL – Expert Analysis & Truth
ringsidereport.com (blog)
By Stan Hernandez Russia has always been a hotbed for UFO activity. They have always been a military superpower and that is what usually attracts extraterrestrial activity. A high ranking military official told me off the record, years ago, …

ufo – Google News

Incoming search terms:

Be Sociable, Share!

Tweet

Posted in UFO's in the news |

Tags: analysis, Blog, expert, mother, ringsidereport.com, roswell, russia, russian, ship, truth |

No Comments »

The Roswell Investigation and the Skeptics

May 6th, 2012 |

Author: Seraphin

I have seen, over the last several months, nothing but criticism from the world of the skeptic about our efforts to assemble a team to investigate the Roswell claims. We have published little about our investigation, other than to announce the members of the team, and the skeptics and debunkers have found nothing to like about it. They are convinced that all we will do is reinforce the ideas that have already been published. That is, we’ll endorse the extraterrestrial and that is it.

In fact, I believe that the only answer they will accept is that Roswell was something mundane, most probably a weather balloon array launched from Alamogordo on June 4, 1947. If we determine anything else, regardless of what evidence we might uncover, it will be rejected as more of the same. They all know that there has been no alien visitation and therefore anything that suggests otherwise is the result of poor technique and investigation on our part.

Any eyewitness testimony that suggests otherwise is the result of poor memory, confabulation or outright lying. Nothing these people say will be believed, unless they provide testimony that what fell was something mundane, most probably a weather balloon array launched from Alamogordo on June 4, 1947.

If, however, the eyewitness testimony reinforces the balloon explanation, then those memories are accurate and reflect reality. It doesn’t matter if those memories are can be proven false with documentation, they must be believed because they lead directly to the accepted explanation.

As I say, all this is ridiculous because we haven’t completed our work. We have developed some interesting leads, but the skeptics are already rejecting our research without seeing any of it.

I’ll give you two minor examples of what we have found. First, I spent some weeks trying to learn if there was any sort of archive that would house NOTAMs. Now, I realize that there really is little of historical value in a NOTAM. These are simply notices to airman about temporary conditions that would affect flight operations. It might be a runway closing, it might be something about lighting at an airfield, or it might be something that could pose a threat to aerial navigation such as the launch of an array of balloons that could cause trouble for an aircraft.

You would think that the answer would be simple to find, but it wasn’t. I called, wrote, emailed and communicated with a couple of dozen different agencies most of them within the FAA. I finally learned that no such archive exists. The rules said that the NOTAMs be held for a short period and then destroyed when no longer useful.

When you think about it, that makes sense since there would have been tens of thousands of them and most would have little historical importance. In other words, once the runway was reopened, who really cared that it had been closed for two weeks half a century earlier… Or that the arrays of balloons that could create an aerial hazard were no longer being launched around Alamogordo. It would have been nice to see, exactly, how the NOTAM was worded, but that information is long gone.

The second point is also relatively minor. The skeptics complain that no one saw the object in the air. We, and by we I mean Don Schmitt, Tom Carey and I have found several different witnesses to an object in the sky at the right time. First was William Woody, who recently died, and who, as a youngster saw something streak across the sky while working outside late one night with his father. Days later, they thought they would go in search of it but were turned back by the military cordon.

Second was E. L. Pyles, who was serving with the 509^th Bomb Group in 1947. He said that as he was walking across the base, he saw something flare across the sky. Karl Pflock dismissed this testimony, writing that Pyles couldn’t remember much. Pyles, according to Karl, said, “It was in forty-seven. I don’t remember the month or the date.”

In the next paragraph, in attempting to learn about the time of night, Karl asked a couple of questions. Pyles replied that a “few days later,” he saw the “RAAF Captures Flying Saucer” story. That means that he couldn’t put an exact date on it, but did identify it as the first week in July, 1947, contrary to Karl’s statement a couple of sentences earlier. In other words, Karl’s criticism was inaccurate, but the skeptics never called him to task on it.

Third are the nuns. We had information based on what had been written in personal diaries. We believed then, and I believe now, that information is accurate. We, as had others, traced those diaries to Oklahoma, but we now have new information on their location. We are attempting to get permission from the church to review them and end this problem. In other words, we hope to see the diary entries in question.

What the diaries would do was put a date on this astronomical phenomenon, whatever it might have been. We should get a good description of it as well as the time it fell. It could be an important bit of documentation. Of course, until we see the actual entries, we won’t know how good that documentation is or even if it is there.

I remember back in the bad old days as the Condon Committee was working their magic, and those on the skeptical side complained that the UFO enthusiasts would accept no answer other than we were being visited. I realized then that Condon had a tough job because of that.

Now I see the same thing from the other side of the fence. It would be nice if the critics would wait until we complete our work and publish the results. They might be surprised by what we find…

Then again, we might be.

UFO updates

Incoming search terms:

Powered by Article Dashboard military tattoo (1)

Be Sociable, Share!

Tweet

Posted in UFO's in the news |

Tags: investigation, roswell, skeptics |

No Comments »

UFO NEWS | UK | Did UFO land on Cannock Chase in Roswell style incident?

May 6th, 2012 |

Author: Seraphin

UFO updates

Incoming search terms:

ufo crash cannock chase real or fake? (1)

Be Sociable, Share!

Tweet

Posted in UFO's in the news |

Tags: Cannock, Chase, incident, land, news, roswell, style |

No Comments »

Did UFO land on Cannock Chase in Roswell style incident? – Sunday Mercury

May 6th, 2012 |

Author: Seraphin

Did UFO land on Cannock Chase in Roswell style incident?
Sunday Mercury
He said the Russian message referred to a UFO malfunctioning and falling to Earth in two parts – the larger section near Penkridge, the other splintering over West Germany. Mystery further surrounded the incident when an eyewitness came forward to say …

ufo – Google News

Be Sociable, Share!

Tweet

Posted in UFO's in the news |

Tags: Cannock, Chase, incident, land, mercury, roswell, style, sunday |

No Comments »

Hidden Roswell UFO Revealed by Lightning Strike (Video) – Gather.com

April 21st, 2012 |

Author: Seraphin

Gather.com

Hidden Roswell UFO Revealed by Lightning Strike (Video)
Gather.com
A UFO video on YouTube shows an eerie, saucer-shaped object floating above the mountains of Roswell, New Mexico, at the moment a lightning strike illuminates the inky blackness of night near Area 51. It doesn't look like a cloud. So what is it?

ufo – Google News

Incoming search terms:

Be Sociable, Share!

Tweet

Posted in UFO's in the news |

Tags: Gather.com, hidden, lightning, revealed, roswell, strike, video |

No Comments »

Mack Brazel/Walt Whitmore Roswell Interview

April 3rd, 2012 |

Author: Seraphin

Not all that long ago a story appeared about a fire in California in which a man, David Aaron, said he lost all of his collection of UFO related materials. Included in that was a reported interview of Mack Brazel telling about the UFO crash on the property he managed. If such was the case, it was something that I have never heard, and it was something that surprised others who had been researching the case for years. But more importantly, we might be able to learn something about what had fallen from the mouth of the man who had found it.

Don Schmitt was able to interview Aaron this last weekend (April 2012) and learned a little more about this. According to what Aaron told Schmitt, he said that he had received an anonymous letter in 2003 with the claim, “My Dad recorded this interview about a UFO crash that happened back in 1947.”

The letter also said that the recording had been transferred from the original wire recording onto cassette audio tape. That, of course tracked with what we all knew, based on interviews with Judd Roberts and others. They had a wire recorder they used at KGFL for news interviews in 1947.

Aaron said that he was able to make duplicate tapes and offered them for sale. I will note here that it seems odd that in 2003, when Aaron received the tape, that neither he nor his source thought to contact any of the researchers who specialized in Roswell, or that he didn’t take the tape to a news organization for release. And I wondered how you would verify that the voice on the tape was that of Mack Brazel which means that the source would have to provide some kind of documentation. Those who knew Brazel were few and far between in 2003, and I’m not sure that they would have recognized the voice after all these years if we could find them. Mack Brazel died in the early 1960s.

Aaron, however, added it to his collection and offered copies for sale. He said that he had sold nine copies of the tape, which also seems odd given what it was supposed to be. I would have thought that it would have done a little better than that.

He told Schmitt that he had made no notes of what was said, that everything was destroyed in the fire, that he did not have the original letter, did not remember the name of the man who contacted him, and he couldn’t provide the names of those who had purchased copies. What was interesting was that the tape wasn’t completely lost. Duplicates existed. All we had to do was find one of those who had bought a copy of the tape, but Aaron had no records of that either.

Aaron advertized the tape as the Brazel/Whitmore interview based on his reading of The Roswell Incident. Schmitt asked if the names Whitmore, Roberts or Joyce were the original owner, but Aaron said they were not.

Aaron told Schmitt that it was an interview with Brazel at KGFL radio, which suggested that this would be the Brazel recanting the earlier, more exciting story.

Aaron never listened to the entire tape, which struck me as odd. Had I been given something like that, I would have listened to the whole thing. Aaron said that he listed to just the beginning, and then he gave it all away. He said that he remembered the announcer saying, “Well, it’s been a couple of interesting days here in Roswell…”

Schmitt recognized the line as soon as Aaron told it to him, and as I was reading the information provided by Schmitt, I recognized it too. This is from the ShowTime original movie, Roswell, with an actor portraying Frank Joyce (Bob Gunton) preparing to interview an actor (Dwight Yoakam) playing Mack Brazel.

That seems to solve the riddle of how we all could have missed this. Someone audio taped the interview from the movie and presented it as the real thing. It explains why they hadn’t sent it on to one of the Roswell researchers. Almost any of us would have recognized it immediately.

As Schmitt noted, “Without a copy of the original tape and no paper trail to the owner, all the facts point to forgery. Until any additional information is forthcoming, this tale was just destroyed by the same fire.”

To finally put this to bed, we’d need to hear a copy of the tape, and there are nine of them out there. While that would prove it to be from the movie, Aaron’s memory of the opening line of the interview almost demolishes any possibility of this being the real thing. Just one more of the many interesting paths in the Roswell case.

UFO updates

‘Metallic Oblate Spheroid’ UFO Photographed Over Roswell, One Month Before Socorro Incident (Photo)

April 2nd, 2012 |

Author: Seraphin

UFO updates

Roswell Tattoo

March 26th, 2012 |

Author: Seraphin

I have always had an interest in what is out there since a young age and still continue to do so til this day. I have always wanted a tattoo of the UFO crash site in Roswell and I finally got it. The tattoo was done over the weekend on the bottom half of my arm. It took 5 hours to complete and I love it!!

–Steve
redsoxfan.sc55@gmail.com